On the latest This Week in Law, an excellent podcast I’ve appeared on a couple times, at the 50:30 mark, discussing the Grooveshark copyright controversy, says that in discussing these services, sometimes we ought to perhaps step back and “channel Stephan Kinsella” and not automatically assume that there is something wrong with copyright infringement, that we should not automatically assume that the content producers’ desire to have copyright is correct. Good for Evan. And h/t me.
The Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF) is dedicated to building public awareness of the manner in which so-called “intellectual property” (IP) laws and policies impede innovation, creativity, communication, learning, knowledge, emulation, and information sharing. We are for property rights, free markets, competition, commerce, cooperation, and the voluntary sharing of knowledge, and oppose IP laws, which systematically impede or hamper innovation. IP law should be completely and immediately abolished.
We provide news commentary and analysis and scholarly resources from our unique pro-property, pro-market, pro-innovation perspective.
To the extent possible under law,
Stephan Kinsella
has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to
C4SIF.
This work is published from:
United States. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a 
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.
You must log in to post a comment. Log in now.