NOTE: See instead now this post: Are Patents and Copyrights “Monopolies”? .
Are Patents “Monopolies”?
Next post: Copyright Troll Backs Down
Previous post: Universities attacking high schools over trademarks
The Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF) is dedicated to building public awareness of the manner in which so-called “intellectual property” (IP) laws and policies impede innovation, creativity, communication, learning, knowledge, emulation, and information sharing. We are for property rights, free markets, competition, commerce, cooperation, and the voluntary sharing of knowledge, and oppose IP laws, which systematically impede or hamper innovation. IP law should be completely and immediately abolished.
We provide news commentary and analysis and scholarly resources from our unique pro-property, pro-market, pro-innovation perspective.
- Will The ‘Right To Repair’ Movement Survive Trumpism 2.0?
- Hertz Continues To Be Hertz, Threatens Customer With Arrest For Using Too Many Of His ‘Unlimited’ Miles
- Daily Deal: Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
- Substackerati’s ‘Grave Concerns’ About White House/Big Tech Collusion Have Disappeared With Elon’s Ascension
- Net Neutrality Is Dead As A Doornail Under Trump 2.0
- Molson Coors Appeals The $56 Million Judgement In Stone Brewing Case
- Texas Ballot Measure Decriminalizes Marijuana Possession, Says ‘Odor Of Marijuana’ Is No Longer Probable Cause
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 405: Regulating Speech In An Age Of Fake News
- It’s Perfectly Fine To Patent Inventions Obtained By Immoral Means Says European Patent Office
- Fifth Circuit Tells MAGA Hat-Wearing Student That Counterspeech Isn’t ‘Racial Harassment’
- Contemporary Politics is Much Better Understood Using Maslow Pyramid Than The Economic Left-to-Right Scale
- Why Political Organizations Always Drift Off Left: O’Sullivan’s Law, Experienced
- Health Circumstances Demand a Longer, Deeper Timeout
- Bitcoin, the Bitcoin Cash roadmap, and the Law of Two Feet
- Pirate Party enters parliament in Luxembourg, gets 17% in Prague
- Analog Equivalent Rights (21/21): Conclusion, privacy has been all but eliminated from the digital environment
- Analog Equivalent Rights (20/21): Your analog boss couldn’t read your mail, ever
- Analog Equivalent Rights (19/21): Telescreens in our Living Rooms
- Analog Equivalent Rights (18/21): Our analog parents had private conversations, both in public and at home
- Analog Equivalent Rights (17/21): The Previous Inviolability of Diaries
You must log in to post a comment. Log in now.