From the great Nina Paley, speaking at TEDxMaastricht.
Nina Paley: Copyright is Brain Damage
Next post: Henry George on Intellectual Property and Copyright
Previous post: Reason and “R Street” Libertarian IP Discussion
C4SIF.org
Pro-Commerce • Anti-Monopoly • Anti-IP • Pro-Innovation
The Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF) is dedicated to building public awareness of the manner in which so-called “intellectual property” (IP) laws and policies impede innovation, creativity, communication, learning, knowledge, emulation, and information sharing. We are for property rights, free markets, competition, commerce, cooperation, and the voluntary sharing of knowledge, and oppose IP laws, which systematically impede or hamper innovation. IP law should be completely and immediately abolished.
We provide news commentary and analysis and scholarly resources from our unique pro-property, pro-market, pro-innovation perspective.
- Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
- This Week In Techdirt History: December 15th – 21st
- Bad Sign: Pocketpair Updates ‘Palworld’ By Nixxing Pal Spheres
- Ctrl-Alt-Speech: How The Online Regulators Stole Christmas
- Success! One Billion Users Will Go Into Production (Late Backers Welcome)
- Fifth Circuit: Salesforce Can’t Use Section 230 To Get Out Of Sex Trafficking Case, Because It Only Provided CRM Software, Not Content Moderation
- ACLU Points Out More Problems With AI-Generated Police Reports
- Daily Deal: Cybersecurity Projects Bundle
- Death Of A Forum: How The UK’s Online Safety Act Is Killing Communities
- Wyden Again Warns That ‘SS7’ Telecom Flaw Lets Foreign Countries Broadly Spy On American Communications
- Contemporary Politics is Much Better Understood Using Maslow Pyramid Than The Economic Left-to-Right Scale
- Why Political Organizations Always Drift Off Left: O’Sullivan’s Law, Experienced
- Health Circumstances Demand a Longer, Deeper Timeout
- Bitcoin, the Bitcoin Cash roadmap, and the Law of Two Feet
- Pirate Party enters parliament in Luxembourg, gets 17% in Prague
- Analog Equivalent Rights (21/21): Conclusion, privacy has been all but eliminated from the digital environment
- Analog Equivalent Rights (20/21): Your analog boss couldn’t read your mail, ever
- Analog Equivalent Rights (19/21): Telescreens in our Living Rooms
- Analog Equivalent Rights (18/21): Our analog parents had private conversations, both in public and at home
- Analog Equivalent Rights (17/21): The Previous Inviolability of Diaries
You must log in to post a comment. Log in now.