I was interviewed yesterday by Jeff Tucker of Laissez-Faire Books about the Apple v. Samsung patent decision. Video below.
Jeffrey Tucker Interviews Stephan Kinsella on Samsung-Apple trial
The Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF) is dedicated to building public awareness of the manner in which so-called “intellectual property” (IP) laws and policies impede innovation, creativity, communication, learning, knowledge, emulation, and information sharing. We are for property rights, free markets, competition, commerce, cooperation, and the voluntary sharing of knowledge, and oppose IP laws, which systematically impede or hamper innovation. IP law should be completely and immediately abolished.
We provide news commentary and analysis and scholarly resources from our unique pro-property, pro-market, pro-innovation perspective.
- Press Glosses Over Fact Trump’s FCC Pick Will Decimate Consumer Protection, Media Consolidation Limits
- Federal Court Says Qualified Immunity Can’t Shield Cop Who Tased Suicidal Man Soaked In Gasoline
- OK State Superintendent Ryan Walters Wants Even More Bibles, Prayers For The Dear Leader
- Daily Deal: The Learn to Paint Course
- ExTwitter’s New Lawsuit Accurately Argues California Deepfake Law Violates First Amendment, Section 230
- Introducing: One Billion Users, The Social Media Card Game
- Streaming TV Enshittification Will Continue Until Morale Improves
- Epic Allows Internet Archive To Distribute For Free ‘Unreal’ & ‘Unreal Tournament’ Forever
- Texas PD’s Massage Parlor Sting Operation Ends With 13 Officers Disciplined, All 23 Criminal Cases Dismissed
- NetChoice Sues California Once Again To Block Its Misguided ‘Social Media Addiction’ Bill
- Contemporary Politics is Much Better Understood Using Maslow Pyramid Than The Economic Left-to-Right Scale
- Why Political Organizations Always Drift Off Left: O’Sullivan’s Law, Experienced
- Health Circumstances Demand a Longer, Deeper Timeout
- Bitcoin, the Bitcoin Cash roadmap, and the Law of Two Feet
- Pirate Party enters parliament in Luxembourg, gets 17% in Prague
- Analog Equivalent Rights (21/21): Conclusion, privacy has been all but eliminated from the digital environment
- Analog Equivalent Rights (20/21): Your analog boss couldn’t read your mail, ever
- Analog Equivalent Rights (19/21): Telescreens in our Living Rooms
- Analog Equivalent Rights (18/21): Our analog parents had private conversations, both in public and at home
- Analog Equivalent Rights (17/21): The Previous Inviolability of Diaries
You must log in to post a comment. Log in now.