≡ Menu

Search: gene quinn

The “Productivity” of Patent Brainstorming

by on January 4, 2012
{ 7 comments }

First U.S. Patent Laws Were First to File, Not First to Invent

by on June 23, 2011
{ 1 comment }

Are anti-IP patent attorneys hypocrites?

by on April 22, 2011
{ 5 comments }

Prior User Rights and Patent Reform

by on April 1, 2011
{ 8 comments }

Patent Shills want to make patents “incontestable”

by on December 30, 2010
{ 8 comments }

A “Patent Stimulus” to End the Recession?

by on December 10, 2010
{ 2 comments }

Absurd Arguments for IP

by on December 10, 2010
{ 8 comments }

Intellectual Property as Socialistic “Human Rights”

by on October 25, 2010
{ 1 comment }
Next Posts Previous Posts

The Center for the Study of Innovative Freedom (C4SIF) is dedicated to building public awareness of the manner in which so-called “intellectual property” (IP) laws and policies impede innovation, creativity, communication, learning, knowledge, emulation, and information sharing. We are for property rights, free markets, competition, commerce, cooperation, and the voluntary sharing of knowledge, and oppose IP laws, which systematically impede or hamper innovation. IP law should be completely and immediately abolished.

We provide news commentary and analysis and scholarly resources from our unique pro-property, pro-market, pro-innovation perspective.

Open Crytpo Alliance

OCALogo_edited.png

Archives

This site rocks the Classic Responsive Skin for Thesis.

WP Admin

CC0
To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to C4SIF. This work is published from: United States. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a  Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.