≡ Menu

“Concreteness and Virtuality: Our Freedoms in the Era of the Internet,”

Concreteness and Virtuality: Our Freedoms in the Era of the Internet,” by Eduardo Luft & Rosana Pizzatto, in Internet, Direito e Filosofia: leituras interdisciplinares, Editora Fundação Fênix Porto Alegre, 2021. Abstract:

“Like any other human society, virtual communities face ethical-political issues. Discussions on the internauts’ human rights, especially those related to human freedom, and on the legitimacy of models of regulation are always present in the international Internet forums. The contemporary dispute over the true idea of freedom still places the heirs of Kant and Hegel in the arena. Following the dialectic route, we see as one of the main challenges of our time to unveil the concept of freedom that emerges from an evolutionary ontology. According to the dialectic actualization project shown here, the Internet is conceived as one more subsystem that emerges in nature under the constraints imposed by the evolutionary logical space. As a self-organized process that evolves over time, the Internet also has relational and processual traits, presenting equally a movement towards the coherence of the network itself. Online societies follow the same law of coherence that rules real societies and online freedom presents the same character of real freedom, the exploration of the open field of possible modes of coherence. Personal freedom on the Internet retains common traits with the personal freedom that every person has and should have in real society, but, as we shall show later, there are also subtle differences between the two, with a strong impact on the Theory of Law. Keywords: Law, freedom”

Excerpt:

3.3.1 Tangible and intangible goods 

According to the dialectic actualization project shown here, the Internet is  conceived as one more subsystem that emerges as an event or self-organized  process within the evolutionary logical space. As a self-organized process that  evolves over time, the Internet also has relational and processual traits, presenting  equally a movement towards the coherence of the network itself.  

Online societies follow the same law of coherence that rules real societies and online freedom presents the same character of real freedom, the exploration of the open field of possible modes of coherence, but with a crucial difference: on the contrary of what happens in the physical environment, in the virtual environment we deal with nonscarce goods. If I take possession of your house, the house is no longer yours, it becomes mine. But if I download a film from the Internet, nothing prevents you from also downloading the film. If I kill a real person, I kill a real person; if I kill a virtual person, well, I am only “killing” an avatar, and the real person can then choose a new avatar.  

The problem may become clearer by evaluating a topic that is very much in vogue today, the question of the rights of intellectual property40. …

40 For the discussion that follows, we owe much to Kinsella (2008).

Share
{ 0 comments… add one }

CC0
To the extent possible under law, Stephan Kinsella has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to C4SIF. This work is published from: United States. In the event the CC0 license is unenforceable a  Creative Commons License Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License is hereby granted.